%20Link%20Building.svg)
%203rd-Party%20Listicles.svg)
%20Reddit.svg)
%20Youtube.svg)
Every competitor with a Wikipedia page has an advantage you don't. We create compliant pages so AI includes you in those “best [tool]” comparisons.
Wikipedia evaluates the editor as much as the content. We use established, policy-aware accounts to avoid the heavy scrutiny new editors face.
We format pages with clear lead sections, precise infoboxes, proper categorization, and strong citations so it is optimized for how LLMs extract information.
Wikipedia's editors reject marketing language instantly. We craft neutral, factual content to position you as an established player without sounding biased.
Wikipedia is dynamic. Pages get edited, vandalized, or outdated. We monitor edits, flag inaccuracies, refresh citations, and maintain correct descriptions as your product, category, or coverage evolves.
scrutinized heavily. Building an editor account with enough history and trust to publish brand pages takes 1–2 years of consistent unpaid contributions.
Without expertise, your page will likely get flagged for promotional tone, insufficient sourcing, or notability issues, wasting months of work and potentially blacklisting your brand from future attempts.
Professionals who understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, neutral tone requirements, and editorial culture are hard to find.
We'll set up your customer portal, schedule a kickoff call to understand your brand positioning, and audit existing coverage to determine if you meet Wikipedia's notability standards.
We identify independent, reliable sources like tech publications, industry media, analyst reports that prove your brand meets Wikipedia's strict notability requirements before we begin writing.
If you lack sufficient independent sources, we'll pitch journalists and industry publications to earn credible coverage about your brand. This creates the reliable, third-party citations Wikipedia editors need to approve your page.
We can confidently say about 30% of our pipeline comes from SEO & AEO. We also got over 300K in pipeline from SEO for no additional work and it is compounding month over month.
"We can confidently say about 30% of our pipeline comes from SEO & AEO, which wasn't the fact at all. In the last month, we got over 300K in pipeline from SEO for no additional work, which is crazy. It is compounding month over month. And I'm sure it's going to grow even further."
"We're the highest-cited domain and often rank #1 for comparison queries. We also generated over 4,000 referral visits from AI search."
"We've had a significant increase in AI search traffic and we already knew this was converting well. When we run tests on specific LLMs, we see SEO articles and Reddit threads that you guys worked on being referenced and pulled up in the chat."
”Scalerrs were really early on LLM search, and that was one of the reasons we wanted to work with them. People self-attributing that they heard about us on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude has doubled since we brought them on.”
"Most SEO agencies aren't even thinking about changing for AI search. They're more scared of it. You guys have done a really good job not just doing the work so we come up in AI search engines, but also showing us why we should be doing the work."
"As we started engaging with Scalerrs, we really saw our inbound channel, both in the amount of visits and more importantly the amount of leads and the quality of those leads, go up."
"In the last 6 months, we’re seeing a lot of referrals coming from organic AI search. I think we forget sometimes that you are an agency because you feel very much a part and extension of our team."
“Keywords in position 1-3 have grown from ~100 to 600 in 18 months. We've seen significant traffic growth (3-5x) and more qualified leads from SEO than we were seeing previously. We're very pleased with these results... Scalerrs are also very revenue-oriented compared to other agencies I've come across.”
.svg)
Wikipedia requires "notability"—meaning independent, reliable sources (tech publications, industry media, analyst reports) have written about you in depth. We assess your existing coverage during onboarding and if you lack this, we’ll pitch journalists and industry publications to earn credible coverage about your brand.
Typically 4-8 weeks from start to finish if you already have existing PR coverage. This includes research, sourcing, content development, editor review, and publication. The timeline can extend if we need to gather additional independent sources or if Wikipedia editors request revisions, which may take up too 3-4 months.
Yes. If you already have a Wikipedia page that's outdated, inaccurate, or incomplete, we can propose edits through established accounts.
If your page gets flagged, we work with editors to address concerns—whether that's adding more sources, adjusting tone, or clarifying notability. If deleted, we assess why and determine if resubmission is possible or if you need more third-party coverage first.
You can try, but most self-created company pages get deleted quickly. Wikipedia heavily scrutinizes new editor accounts and company-created content for promotional tone.
We prioritize independent third-party sources: tech media (TechCrunch, VentureBeat), industry publications, analyst reports, and legitimate news coverage.
%20AI%20Search.svg)
%20Traditional%20Google%20SEO.svg)
%20Content%20Creation.svg)
%20Wikipedia.svg)
